The Employment Law Group® Negotiates $1.1 Million Settlement for Client

Thursday, March 3rd, 2011 | Breach of Contract, Executive Compensation, Executive Compensation Attorney, The Employment Law Group | No Comments

The Employment Law Group® law firm negotiated a $1.1 million settlement for their client, an executive alleging his employer breached the employment contract.  The client wrote, “… without [The Employment Law Group’s ®] assistance, I never would have gotten the outcome we have.”  To learn more about our employment contract disputes practice, click here.

MSPB Affirms Right to Review for Federal Workers in National Security Positions

Wednesday, January 19th, 2011 | Executive Compensation Attorney | No Comments

In the case of Conyers v. Dep’t of Defense, The Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) affirmed the right of federal employees to have the merit of their denial of eligibility for national security positions reviewed by the MSPB.  Without such basic protections, government agencies could classify nearly any position as relating to national security, deny a federal employee eligibility for the position (even if they are currently working in the position), and then fire them without any possibility for review by an independent body or further justification by the agency. 

The appellant, Rhonda Conyers was an Accounting Technician working for the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) until the agency indefinitely suspended her because she had been “denied eligibility to occupy a sensitive position by [the agency’s] Washington Headquarters Consolidated Adjudications Facility.”  The agency only stated that her position required her to have access to sensitive information, she had been denied access, and therefore she did not meet a qualification requirement of her position.  Seemingly at odds with the agency’s findings was the fact that the agency allowed Conyers to work at her position for nearly two years after determining she was not eligible to hold a national security position.  Additionally, the agency chose not to pursue her removal under an existing statute, 5 U.S.C. Sec. 7532, which allows agencies to remove employees for national security purposes but affords the employees some amount of due process such as requiring the agency to state its justification.  Instead, the agency chose to remove Conyers without affording her even the most basic of due process rights.

The MSPB was careful to distinguish the Conyers case from Egan v. Dep’t Navy, a Supreme Court case in which the court acknowledged that the President has some authority to “classify and control access to information bearing on national security.”  Relying on its previous decision in Jacobs v. Dep’t of the Army, the MSPB stated:

The Supreme Court’s decision in Egan was narrow in scope and specifically applied only to security clearance revocations.  As the protector of the government’s merit systems, the [MSPB] is not eager to expand the scope of the rationale in Egan to divest federal employees whose positions do not require a security clearance of basic protections against non-meritorious agency actions.

…

The [MSPB] may exercise its full statutory review authority and review the agency’s determination that [Conyers] is no longer eligible to hold a “sensitive” position, because this appeal does not involve a discretionary agency decision regarding a security clearance.

Click on the following links to learn more about Federal Employee Rights or to get the answers to many Common Security Clearance Questions.

TELG Principal Named Top Ten Leader in Employment Law for Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Area

Thursday, December 30th, 2010 | Executive Compensation Attorney | No Comments

R. Scott Oswald, Managing Principal of The Employment Law Group® law firm, was named as one of the top ten leaders in employment law for the Greater Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Area.  Top Ten Leaders are selected primarily based on five criteria:

1. Reputation among peers, based on multiple interviews with other professionals;
2. Leadership and written work on behalf of professional organizations, such as sections and committees of state professional organizations;
3. Number of years practicing in their area of expertise;
4. Degree of focus on a practice area; and
5. Volume of clients;

R. Scott Oswald also serves as President-Elect of the Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association, lectures extensively on employment and whistleblower law, and has authored numerous articles on innovations and trends in state and federal law.  For more information about The Employment Law Group® and to view R. Scott Oswald’s full biography, click here.

Judge Allows Options Backdating Case to Move Forward Against Microtune CFO

Thursday, November 4th, 2010 | Executive Compensation Attorney | No Comments

Judge Jane Boyle of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas refused to grant summary judgment, allowing the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to continue its prosecution of Nancy Richardson, the former Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel of Microtune Inc. – a designer of radio tuners.  The SEC alleges that, along with former CEO Douglas Bartek, Richardson committed fraud by backdating options to dates when Microtune’s share price was low (thus increasing the option’s monetary value) without disclosing the backdating in its financial statements as required by law.  For more information about The Employment Law Group® and its SEC Whistleblower Practice, click here.

Federal Judge Dismisses Zurich Am. Ins. Co.’s Claims that Former Sales Manager Conspired with Employee to Breach Noncompete

Thursday, October 28th, 2010 | Executive Compensation Attorney | No Comments

According to Law360, a federal judge for the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia dismissed Zurich American Insurance Co.’s claims against its former regional sales manager, David Neuenschwander. Zurich alleged that Neuenschwander conspired with another former employee, Toby Turbyfill, to breach Turbyfill’s noncompete agreement with Zurich by soliciting Zurich’s customers. The court found that Zurich failed to show that Neuenschwander even knew about Turbyfill’s noncompete agreement or had engaged in any improper or unlawful conduct. For information about The Employment Law Group® law firm and Non-Compete Litigation, click here.

IBM Sues Former Executive for Return of $350,000 Signing Bonus

Monday, September 13th, 2010 | Executive Compensation Attorney | No Comments

On Sept 3, 2010, IBM filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland alleging that former executive David Zolet breached a contract requiring him to repay a $350,000 signing bonus.  According to the complaint, Zolet received a $350,000 signing bonus payable over his first two months of employment.  Zolet signed an offer letter and repayment agreement stipulating that the bonus was not earned until he completed two years of employment and that he is obligated to repay the bonus “unless [his] departure is the result of a unilateral determination by IBM without cause to end [his] employment.”  The complaint states that IBM has verbally requested Zolet to return the money but he has refused and “represented to IBM that he will not do so unless IBM satisfies certain conditions that are not required by either the Offer Letter or Repayment Agreement.”  A copy of the complaint is available here. 

Whether you need help negotiating an executive compensation or severance package or litigating an employment-related contract dispute, you can trust the experienced attorneys of The Employment Law Group® to safeguard your interests and fight of your rights.  To learn more about firm’s Employment Contract Dispute Practice, click here.

HP Sues Former CEO for “Inevitable Disclosure” of Trade Secrets

Monday, September 13th, 2010 | Executive Compensation Attorney | No Comments

According to Law360, HP has sued former CEO Michael Hurd who was recently hired by Oracle.  At the time of his departure, Hurd signed agreements promising not to disclose HP’s confidential information.  However, he did not sign a non-compete agreement.  HP’s suit alleges that Hurd will inevitably disclose HP’s confidential information while performing his duties for Oracle.

This suit highlights the importance of hiring experienced counsel to review any proposed executive compensation or severance package.  Whether you are a corporate executive developing a compensation package for your top executives or an executive negotiating a deal commensurate with your market value, you can trust the experience of The Employment Law Group®.  For more information about TELG and the firm’s Executive Compensation Practice, click here.

Jury Awards $26 Million to U.S. Small Business in Trade Secrets Lawsuit Against Chinese Manufacturer and Dubai Distributer

Tuesday, July 27th, 2010 | Executive Compensation Attorney | No Comments

On July 15, 2010, a jury for the U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of Virginia returned a verdict totaling $26 million in favor of Jordan Fishman against a Chinese tire manufacturer and a Dubai tire distributor for stealing trade secrets and infringing upon Fishman’s copyrights and trademarks.  Fishman’s small businesses, Tire Engineering & Distribution LLC and Alpha Tire Systems, specialize in designing underground mining tires.  Conspiring with an employee of Fishman’s, the Chinese and Dubai companies stole Fishman’s tire designs and sold similar tires under their brand names. 

For information on The Employment Law Group® law firm’s Executive Compensation Practice, click here.

Ethics Resource Center Publishes New Report on Reducing Misconduct in the Workplace

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010 | Executive Compensation Attorney | No Comments

On June 23, 2010, the Ethics Resource Center released a new report entitled, “The Importance of Ethical Culture:  Increasing Trust and Driving Down Risks.”  The report discusses the need for a top-down approach to ethics and the impact of co-worker culture on observed and perceived instances of misconduct in the workplace.  A copy of the report is available on the ERC website, here.

To learn more about The Employment Law Group® law firm’s Employment Law and Counseling Practice, click here.

Employment Lawyer Scott Oswald Presents at DC Bar

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010 | Breach of Contract, Executive Compensation, Executive Compensation Attorney, Noncompete Litigation, Noncompetition Litigation, Severance Agreements | No Comments

On June 14, 2010, Scott Oswald, Principal at The Employment Law Group® law firm, spoke at a D.C. Bar CLE event entitled “Fundamentals of Employment Law:  Establishing the Employment Relationship.”  For more information about upcoming speaking engagements featuring the employment attorneys of TELG, click here.